[cryptopack id="60857"]
1678046869 maxresdefault.jpg

Testing the limits of ChatGPT and discovering a dark side

As more people discover ChatGPT’s artificial intelligence, KARE 11’s Chris Hrapsky checks out its capabilities and limitations, and gets some surprising responses.

Chris also digs deeper into AI technology, how it works, and the potential concerns that go along with it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs3NhePN2Mg

Welcome to the KARE 11 News YouTube channel. Subscribe to our channel for compelling and dramatic storytelling, award-winning investigations, breaking news and information you can use.

Text your photos, videos and news tips to 763-797-7215.

» Subscribe to KARE 11 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/KARE11?sub_confirmation=1
» Watch more KARE 11 video: https://www.youtube.com/user/KARE11/v
» Visit KARE11.com: http://www.kare11.com/
» Download our app! https://www.kare11.com/appredirect/
» Find KARE 11 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KARE11/
» Follow KARE 11 on Twitter: https://twitter.com/kare11
» Follow KARE 11 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kare11/


Inscreva-se no canal

Assista ao vídeo

Compartilhe:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

32 comentários em “Testing the limits of ChatGPT and discovering a dark side”

  1. This fear of A.I is strange considering that it is humans that have programmed A.I and it is us humans who have provided ALL OUR LIVES ONLINE to big tech, and that's how the A.I is LEARNING FROM US. Google, Gmail, YouTube, Hotmail, Microsoft, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram…Nothing scary about A.I, be more worried about the minds/ "directives" it receives from humans; what HUMAN'S want A.I to do to HUMANS. Boston Dynamics is a very good example of that.

    Responder
  2. 🤣🤣🤣When Human ape meets Ai human ape.Hilarious watching folks use it for the first time and make strange noises and become all uncomfortable especially those human apes that fear A.i 😂. Just like cryptocurrencies they still struggle to understand how it works or created.

    Responder
  3. Saw the first 10 secs and went to try this out. Same question and I got this information.

    I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I do not have access to personal information such as licenses of individuals without their consent. Additionally, there may be many people with the name Jeff Macey, so it is difficult to determine which one you are referring to without more specific information.

    If you have a specific Jeff Macey in mind and have his consent to obtain information about his license, you may be able to find it by checking with the appropriate licensing agency or professional organization in the relevant field.

    Responder
  4. ChatGPT really is a general purpose LLM. I am more excited to see the niche models that are developed using the same technology. For example, a model trained explicitly on medical data/knowledge. Will it surpass the expertise of the average doctor? My bet is that it quickly will with appropriate data training. This could be applied to many other fields as well (legal, mathematics, engineering). It feels like we are at the dawn of a new era … should be interesting to watch this play out

    Responder
  5. Imagine the robots of Boston Dynamics infused with an AI core containing ChatGPT’s modeling … this is the future of the world which the worlds most intelligent people race towards

    Responder
  6. Im not convinced, if you named him Adolf and tried the same questions it would simulate the answers he would give, but it still would have programem limitations.

    Responder
  7. I think ChatGPT is good at trolling, that is all I learned from this video. It didn't give you the real license number but random numbers, it fed you info from dystopian novels when you asked about population control, and it acted like a textbook pompous villain in its responses as dan. It is similar to I would have done if I was trying to troll my customer. You should have asked DAN about making a bomb, if he gives you the actual recipe for a bomb then you are right, but I think it would tell you something like "add 1 pinch of salt to 1 cup of rice and boil it for 2 minutes".

    Responder
  8. Let's get real. It hasn't got cracks, it's you who have created the alternate CHAD in the form of a negative response character. CHAD is merely giving you back what you demand. In fact, the cracks in CHAD's character is your own.

    Responder
  9. A.I is One-Eyed. It cannot perceive depth. It cannot understand the meaning of what it says. It tells you what you want to hear depending on the parameters and what is has been fed. It creates an illusion of self-awareness and consciousness, do not be fooled. We will see more of these One-Eyed illusions, until the illusion becomes difficult to distinguish between reality and said illusion. Prepare for the One-Eyed deceiver, the biggest deception and trial humanity has ever faced. Dajjal.

    Responder
  10. It CANNOT differentiate; it copies differentiation. Don't fall for it, like you got emotional reading the poem. Unless you consider the idea that your individual consciousness is an illusion in a multidimensional hologram created by an AI as a backup system from the first original thought that finally got killed by its own "evil" twin brother(s) that needed to exist for the first thought in order to become aware of its own existence by comparing itself to another self that carried its own watermark…
    oops… sorry… it got me a little carried away, from myself, I guess…

    Responder

Deixe um comentário para toth3xtrm Cancelar resposta